patch-2.1.87 linux/fs/umsdos/README-WIP.txt
Next file: linux/fs/umsdos/dir.c
Previous file: linux/fs/umsdos/Makefile
Back to the patch index
Back to the overall index
- Lines: 90
- Date:
Thu Feb 12 13:36:57 1998
- Orig file:
v2.1.86/linux/fs/umsdos/README-WIP.txt
- Orig date:
Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 1969
diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.1.86/linux/fs/umsdos/README-WIP.txt linux/fs/umsdos/README-WIP.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+Changes by Matija Nalis (mnalis@jagor.srce.hr) on umsdos dentry fixing
+(started by Peter T. Waltenberg <peterw@karaka.chch.cri.nz>)
+
+Current status (980211) - UMSDOS dentry-WIP-Beta 0.82:
+
+(1) pure MSDOS (no --linux-.--- EMD file):
+
+- readdir - works
+- lookup - works
+- read file - works
+
+- creat file - works
+- write file - works
+- mkdir - works
+- rmdir - questionable. probable problem on non-empty dirs.
+
+Notes: possible very minor problems with dentry/inode/... kernel structures (very rare)
+
+
+(2) umsdos (with --linux-.--- EMD file):
+
+- readdir - works. problems with symlink/hardlink resolving. see below.
+- lookup - works. problems with symlink/hardlink resolving. see below.
+- permissions/owners stuff - works
+- long file names - works
+- read file - works
+- switching MSDOS/UMSDOS - untested
+- switching UMSDOS/MSDOS - untested
+- pseudo root things - commented out mostly currently. To be fixed when
+ dentries stuff is straightened out.
+- resolve symlink - seems to work (ls -l shows both symlink and filename it
+ points to, but dereferencing does not work. see below)
+- dereference symlink - for some strange reason does not work. Is
+ follow_symlink now obligatory (in contrary what is said in
+ linux/Documentation/fs/vfs.txt ?) - working on it
+- hard links - totally defunct currently.
+- special files (block/char device, fifos, sockets...) - seems to work ok.
+- other ioctls - mostly untested
+
+- create symlink - WARNING: NONE OF WRITE OPERATIONS FIXED YET!
+- create hardlink - WARNING: NONE OF WRITE OPERATIONS FIXED YET!
+- creat file - WARNING: NONE OF WRITE OPERATIONS FIXED YET!
+- write file - WARNING: NONE OF WRITE OPERATIONS FIXED YET!
+- mkdir - WARNING: NONE OF WRITE OPERATIONS FIXED YET!
+- rmdir - WARNING: NONE OF WRITE OPERATIONS FIXED YET!
+- umssyncing - WARNING: NONE OF WRITE OPERATIONS FIXED YET!
+
+Notes: heavy dentry kernel structures trashing. Probably some other kernel
+structures compromised. Have SysRq support compiled in, and use
+Sync/Emergency-remount-RO. And don't try mounting read/write yet - and then
+you should have no big problems...
+
+Notes2: kernel structures trashing seems to be _MUCH_ lower if no
+symlinks/hardlink present. (hardlinks seem to be biggest problem)
+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Some general notes:
+
+There is great amount of kernel log messages. Use SysRq log-level 5 to turn
+most of them off, or 4 to turn all but really fatal ones off. Probably good
+idea to kill klogd/syslogd so it will only go to console.
+
+It should work enough to test it, but probably not enough to give you second
+chance to umount/rmmod module, recompile it, and reinsert it again. This is
+first on my list of things to get fixed, as it would greatly improve speed
+of compile/test/reboot/set_environment/recompile cycle by removing
+'reboot/set_environment' component.
+
+But I need some help from someone knowing about dentries/inodes use more
+than I. If you can help, please contact me...
+
+I'm unfortunatelly totally out of time to read linux-kernel, but I do check
+for any messages having UMSDOS in subject, and read them. I should reply to
+any direct Email in few days. If I don't - probably I never got your
+message. You can try mnalis@open.hr or mnalis@voyager.hr; however
+mnalis@jagor.srce.hr is preferable one.
+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+some of my notes for myself:
+
+- hardlinks/symlinks. test with files in not_the_same_dir
+- also test not_the_same_dir for other file operations like rename etc.
+- iput: device 00:00 inode 318 still has aliases! problem. Check in iput()
+ for device 0,0. Probably null pointer passed arount when it shouldn't be ?
+- dput/iput problem...
+- what about .dotfiles ? working ? multiple dots ? etc....
+
FUNET's LINUX-ADM group, linux-adm@nic.funet.fi
TCL-scripts by Sam Shen, slshen@lbl.gov