patch-2.1.48 linux/include/asm-ppc/softirq.h
Next file: linux/include/asm-ppc/spinlock.h
Previous file: linux/include/asm-ppc/socket.h
Back to the patch index
Back to the overall index
- Lines: 79
- Date:
Thu Jul 31 13:09:18 1997
- Orig file:
v2.1.47/linux/include/asm-ppc/softirq.h
- Orig date:
Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 1969
diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.1.47/linux/include/asm-ppc/softirq.h linux/include/asm-ppc/softirq.h
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+/*
+ * Software interrupts..
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ASM_SOFTIRQ_H
+#define __ASM_SOFTIRQ_H
+
+#include <asm/atomic.h>
+#include <asm/hardirq.h>
+
+#define get_active_bhs() (bh_mask & bh_active)
+#define clear_active_bhs(x) atomic_clear_mask((x),&bh_active)
+
+extern inline void init_bh(int nr, void (*routine)(void))
+{
+ bh_base[nr] = routine;
+ bh_mask_count[nr] = 0;
+ bh_mask |= 1 << nr;
+}
+
+extern inline void remove_bh(int nr)
+{
+ bh_base[nr] = NULL;
+ bh_mask &= ~(1 << nr);
+}
+
+extern inline void mark_bh(int nr)
+{
+ set_bit(nr, &bh_active);
+}
+
+/*
+ * These use a mask count to correctly handle
+ * nested disable/enable calls
+ */
+extern inline void disable_bh(int nr)
+{
+ bh_mask &= ~(1 << nr);
+ bh_mask_count[nr]++;
+}
+
+extern inline void enable_bh(int nr)
+{
+ if (!--bh_mask_count[nr])
+ bh_mask |= 1 << nr;
+}
+
+#ifndef __SMP__
+
+/*
+ * The locking mechanism for base handlers, to prevent re-entrancy,
+ * is entirely private to an implementation, it should not be
+ * referenced at all outside of this file.
+ */
+
+extern int __ppc_bh_counter;
+
+extern inline void start_bh_atomic(void)
+{
+ __ppc_bh_counter++;
+ barrier();
+}
+
+extern inline void end_bh_atomic(void)
+{
+ barrier();
+ __ppc_bh_counter--;
+}
+
+/* These are for the irq's testing the lock */
+#define softirq_trylock() (__ppc_bh_counter? 0: ((__ppc_bh_counter=1),1))
+#define softirq_endlock() (__ppc_bh_counter = 0)
+
+#else
+#error Nein, wir haben noch kein SMP
+#endif
+
+#endif
FUNET's LINUX-ADM group, linux-adm@nic.funet.fi
TCL-scripts by Sam Shen, slshen@lbl.gov